You are here: Manchester Confidential › Property & Business.
THERE has been a little bit of Christmas cheer for the long suffering leaseholders at Timber Wharf who had to pay £1m to get the leaky roof of their multi-award winning building fixed.
If you missed instalments one to five of this saga you can catch up here: part one, two, three, four and five.
“Nobody should have had to go through this and it makes me question whether I would ever buy another flat"
After much wrangling the NHBC has finally paid out some insurance money, around £550,000, and half of that has been passed back to owners. It is hoped the final payout will be nearer £750,000.
The other half is being held back by the building’s own management committee until a final debting dozen or so of owners make a contribution and until the cost of initial work such as reports and excavations are calculated.
The Committee is hoping to pay out a second tranche in the New Year with a third and final instalment coming when the NHBC agrees its final amount. They have pledged that this money will go back to owners and not be swallowed up in the sinking fund.
Credit to the Management Committee for continuing to have the energy to pursue this and a very small and belated bit of credit to developer Urban Splash which says it does not want back any of the £150,000 it contributed for the sixteen apartments it still owns. The very least it could do given the decade of misery owners have suffered.
Even when the NHBC agreed it would be liable for some of the damage (Its warranty never covered the flat roof) the process of claiming has been painful with every owner having to fill in overly complicated and confusing forms.
The building’s management company, Mainstay, has been playing its part but there have been grumblings about it taking so very long.
Still, some money has been paid back which shows you should never give up the fight – however painful.
Tom Coyle, one of the management committee directors, said: “Nobody should have had to go through this and it makes me question whether I would ever buy another flat.
“People should be under no illusion that leases are always written in favour of the freeholder and they should be examined very carefully, line by line, before you buy.”
The repair work to the building should be completed early in 2015.
Follow @JillBurdett
Like what you see? Enter your email to sign up for our newsletters which are chock-a-block with more great reviews, news, deals and savings.
7 comments so far, continue the conversation, write a comment.
Repeating,without any evidence the same point that socialism = public services is hardly…
Read moreYou absolutely right,I hate all these bloody nimbys stopping development and progress.Of course if…
Read moreManchester's size and climate isn't dissimilar to Rotterdam or Dusseldorf but the city is held back…
Read moreStraying off the point again David, which is that investing in public services is socialist but as…
Read more© Mark Garner t/a Confidential Direct 2021
Privacy | Careers | Website by: Planet Code | SEO by The eWord
Urban Splash built it. They should have corrected it
Tom Bloxham's directly connected to this fiasco yet he's got his name attached to all sorts of committees and organisations, including the University. What's all that about?
Don't understand this either. The man's regarded as a messiah when in essence he's a cowboy builder with no remorse.
There seems to be a lot of personal venom against this man,and it's not all from people living in this building,a lot of it is pure male jealousy.I don't want to defend Bloxham for this building,but he is not a cowboy builder and he invested money in Manchester property when pretty much nobody else would dare touch it.
Bloxham is not a criminal.There are far worse people than him with there names attached to various things. We have a had a string of sex convictions against staff from Chethams Music school for instance but despite that,they got huge huge amount public money to build their new concert hall
If you remember those huge photographs of people that surrounded Central Library for a couple of years during the refurb, one of them was of Bloxham. Perhaps the council has a soft spot for him too.
The photograph above is very interesting, that looks like a poor repair, not original build, not that this defends the original build. Mainstay when I lived in a flat they "maintain"ed, didnt seem to understand what quality control of maintenance was, cost control, or what preventative maintenance was. A long term maintenance schedule seemed to cnosistn of paining the corridors once every few years and cleaning the windows occasionally. Ask them for a 10 or 20 year maintenance schedule and the reply was entertaining!