Welcome to Manchester Confidential
Reset Password
The Confidential websites will be undergoing routine updates. This may cause the sites to go offline. We apologise in advance for any inconvenience.

You are here: Manchester ConfidentialNews.

The Leaders Debate: a review

Jonathan Schofield wants more from the three men who want his support, and wants less of Alastair Stewart

Written by . Published on April 16th 2010.


The Leaders Debate: a review

“It's changing the face of British politics.”

“It's a revolutionary moment in British broadcasting history.”

“Manchester is making political history.”

Nick Clegg got particularly annoyed about Gordon Brown's attempt, whilst discussing electoral reform, to flirt with him. Gordon was almost fluttering his eyes, almost saying 'come on baby, we can do coalition, you know you want to, just say yes and we can do it – together'.

Broadcasting voices were a bit crazed on Thursday as the ITV Leaders Debate came to the city. Broadcasting wanted to tell us how very very important the debate was. They wanted to make sure we knew this. Broadcasting is nothing if not utterly self-regarding.

The three men they were talking about didn't at first seem to appreciate all the hullabaloo. Stood on their Granada Studios stage in various subtle shades - pale grey suit with yellow tie, navy blue with Manchester City coloured tie and black with pink tie – they shuffled about a bit, looking shifty.

When they got used to things, Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, was the most confident in body language, leaning forward, leaning backwards, sticking a casual hand in a trouser pocket, like a kid in a playground who thinks he owns the school. He was the only one who was prepared to look his opponents in the eyes.

David Cameron was strangely muted, trying to show a gentler side to Toryism, but ending up looking like a person lacking in confidence.

Gordon Brown seemed as confident as Clegg, but kept sporting the unnerving smile of the slightly unhinged.

They had all their tactics ready. Gordon mentioned the 'values' of his upbringing after 28 minutes of the ninety minute programme and would mention his parents and childhood three more times. Honesty was another of his key words. “Come on David,” he kept repeating, “let's be honest here...” Which seemed rich for a politician who'd been in power through the Iraq crisis.

David kept referring to his own children, and said 'hard-working' so many times it must have been hard-work. Nick Clegg kept going on about 'my city, Sheffield' as though he were worried about being re-elected. He wanted 'openness'. He wanted so much openness there was a danger he might spill bedroom secrets.

The only attempts at any wit came from Gordon, “David, you can't airbrush your policies, like you can airbrush your posters.”

The only attempt at any anger and passion came from Nick Clegg. He got annoyed about Gordon Brown's attempt, whilst discussing electoral reform, to flirt with him. Gordon was almost fluttering his eyes, almost saying 'come on baby, we can do coalition, you know you want to, just say yes and we can do it – together'.

After the third time of Gordon saying, “I agree with Nick and I think he agrees with me”, Nick audibly went “Pah!” When Gordon a minute later said, “Nick supports me on this,” Nick interjected petulantly, “There's nothing to support.”

Confidential marked each policy element of the date – intro, immigration, expenses, education, economy, defence, health and conclusion - as an outright win for one point and as a shared victory for half a point.

Gordon Brown got 2.5, David Cameron 3 and Nick Clegg 4.5. This was a surprise because in terms of personality David Cameron was more wooden than a log.

Still, whether 'Manchester made political history' is another thing. What happened was merely something that should have happened a couple of decades earlier.

It was interesting but not critical for the election. Above all, the debates need more energy, more wit, more passion, more verve, more direct questioning and more audience reaction to feed the politicians apetite for fight. The programme even needs a better set design. Personally I'd prefer them round a table, not at lecterns, looking each other in the eye, really letting go. We don't have to do everything like the Americans.

What the show doesn't need is Alastair Stewart. One of the oddest parts to the whole proceeding was his weird shrill barks of “David Cameron!” or “Nick Clegg!” He should calm down, or learn to interrupt at the right time.

Like what you see? Enter your email to sign up for our newsletters which are chock-a-block with more great reviews, news, deals and savings.

6 comments so far, continue the conversation, write a comment.

Stuart BamberApril 16th 2010.

"Gordon Brown got 2.5, David Cameron 3 and Nick Clegg 4.5"

Fair enough, although the general vox pop seems to be that Cameron was well ahead of Brown. More 2/3.5/4.5 respectively. Clegg did really well, and on this performance alone has probably made a Lab-Lib coalition the most likely outcome come May 6th. Thoughts Mr Ed?

Hero
George PoultonApril 16th 2010.

I thought Nick Clegg came out the best on the issues, as well as on presentation, particularly on trident and mp's expenses. Will still be voting Green though

LexyApril 16th 2010.

"What the show doesn't need is Sir Alastair Burnet"

Strange, I thought it was Alistair Stewart hosting.... EDITORIAL: Thanks - changed. Schofield was writing it at midnight and had gone mad.

HaApril 18th 2010.

I'm now voting Liberal after that performance. Loved the policies too about education, parliament and trident

AgricolaApril 18th 2010.

Not sure about Trident. It's good to sit at the top table with weapons. But the rest is enough for me to vote Liberal

Leigh ScottApril 20th 2010.

Clegg will win the next debate too.In my mind he has tough policies on immigration and I belive that's next on the agenda when Sky news hold round 2!

To post this comment, you need to login.Please complete your login information.
OR CREATE AN ACCOUNT HERE..
Or you can login using Facebook.

Latest Rants

Anonymous

Repeating,without any evidence the same point that socialism = public services is hardly…

 Read more
Anonymous

You absolutely right,I hate all these bloody nimbys stopping development and progress.Of course if…

 Read more
Anonymous

Manchester's size and climate isn't dissimilar to Rotterdam or Dusseldorf but the city is held back…

 Read more
Anonymous

Straying off the point again David, which is that investing in public services is socialist but as…

 Read more

Explore The Site

© Mark Garner t/a Confidential Direct 2017

Privacy | Careers | Website by: Planet Code | SEO by The eWord