Welcome to Manchester Confidential
Reset Password
News
You are here: Manchester Confidential › News.
Fire Station CPO Rejected
Manchester City Council loses legal row as Pickles rejects London Road fire station CPO
THE hotly contested legal row over the compulsory purchase order to take the London Road Fire Station off Britannia Hotels has been lost by Manchester City Council.
Communities Secretary Eric Pickles rejected the council’s public interest argument that the landmark building needed rescuing by forcing Britannia to sell.
A spokesman for Manchester City Council said: "We are disappointed and surprised at this judgement.
Critics say the council has made the case personal against Britannia owner Alex Langsam; the local authority has not intervened with the same energy to bring forward redevelopment of the Employment Exchange and former Mayfield station in the same area of Piccadilly.
Britannia argued that it has planning permission to turn the fire station building into a four-star hotel. The fire station closed 25 years ago and has been vacant ever since.
The council's legal bill is estimated to be £700,000. A spokesman for Manchester City Council said: "We are disappointed and surprised at this judgement.
“This landmark building has been lying largely empty and disused for a quarter of a century while under Britannia's ownership.
"Our clear and consistent goal throughout this process has been to bring this Grade II-listed building back into use so that it makes a positive contribution to the regeneration of Piccadilly rather than blighting it.
"We note that, as a result of the public inquiry, Britannia have made a public pledge to return London Road Fire Station to use as a high quality hotel as soon as possible. The people of Manchester will hold them to that promise and no one will be more pleased than us if they honour their words.”
Like what you see? Enter your email to sign up for our newsletters which are chock-a-block with more great reviews, news, deals and savings.
27 comments so far, continue the conversation, write a comment.
Latest Rants
Know your username(which is same as your employee number) Now click this link. And complete your…
Read moreI grew up there and knew Jeannie glynn and Clifford my friend is the girl that Clifford was crying…
Read moreRepeating,without any evidence the same point that socialism = public services is hardly…
Read more
Explore The Site
Content
About Us
© Mark Garner t/a Confidential Direct 2018
Privacy | Careers | Website by: Planet Code | SEO by The eWord
That's another increase in parking fees on the cards than. Priceless.
Surprised. Any comment from Britannia yet?
Pity that .... Maybe time to devote some energy to saving Ancoats Dispensary Council? - £200 000 to secure the structure for medium term - let the Victorian Soc have it and help them save it!
www.petitiononline.co.uk/…/3320…
yeah Urban Splash are another "Britannia" promising the earth and failing to deliver unless theres something in it for them! ie Visible profit. They are ok taking on these old buildings esp the Dispensary, but leaving them to rack and ruin suggests they are just after the land and the freehold ultimately which obviously appreciates quite nicely until such decisions as disposal/demolistion are made, stringent contracts need drawing up and then enforcing to ensure costs dont then fall upon the gullible unwilling taxpayer! Deal with the delapidated gems first like Ancoats Dispensary with its rich tapestry of local history, Shame Bloxham isnt as sentimental being another profiteering southerner eh?
Visible profit, that's usually the idea as a property developer. Or are we expected to develop at a loss ?
I think this is a poor decision. The building is presently an eyesore and Manchester deserves better. A CPO might have got the wheels in motion in providing a solution to development. The only good news is that if Britannia again do nothing for a long period then they will look perfidious.
I don't think being accused of perfidy will trouble this team!
As far as I am led to believe (correct me if I'm wrong), 25 years ago, after the abolition of the GMC (by the previous Conservative government) , the Fire Station was disposed of (by competition) for approx £100k . This was subject to a number of evaluated proposals for its development ( a condition of the sale I would expect). How, after a quarter of a century can the current owners get away with reneging on a contractual undertaking that influenced the knock down purchase price (meaning their ownership was effectively subsidised by the tax payer).
Someone needs to openly go through the original disposal terms and enforce them - or at least make them public - there's a failing somewhere...
Well they should have a few quid to get started when they get their costs back of the Council or should I say Us
How on earth did the decision go in favour of Britannia? Would be interested in seeing more detail...
Balloon face Pickles hates Labour controlled councils and would rather support the nasty Britannia hotels
Pickles has obviously never stayed in a Britannia hotel
This city is becoming a complete joke.
Just like the rest of the country
What else is bothering you?
hey Jo - think you've hit the nail on the head with that remark!
It won't become a hotel for another 25 years... Fail.
wonder if mr. langsam contributes to the tory party?
Britania has the website for the fire station with a link to their old proposal
www.britanniahotels.com/…/…
"January 2010 update"
on which they say
"If you feel you can add to our proposals, please let us know by emailing us at:
thefirestation@britanniahotels.com
Would anyone like to try this??
The council's legal bill is estimated to be £700,000. is it the Council money or Manchesters Council tax payers money. struggling working families, no doubt. I for one wasnt informed of this leagle challenge.
My proposal is dont contest with our money again unless 100% sure of a win.
What did MCC propose to do with the site if the CPO had gone through ? And would it have incurred further expenditure of Council tax payers money ?
Very disappointed that the government has overruled the council on this. So much for localism. Britannia now need to pull their finger out and develop the site. Sensitively.
It's a non starter there's nowhere to park
Apart from the multi-storey directly across the road.....
I don't think your allowed to build unless you have your own parking
They should make it into apartments, Manchester is in need of more apartments in fantastic locations such as this. There are sooo many hotels being built in and around Manchester surely we won't need anymore?!
It probably looks like a Britannia inside anyway. They just need to start charging.....