Welcome to Manchester Confidential
Reset Password
The Confidential websites will be undergoing routine updates. This may cause the sites to go offline. We apologise in advance for any inconvenience.

You are here: Manchester ConfidentialNews.

Darkness Visible: Why Is Manchester So Dark?

Jonathan Schofield on the lack of illumination on landmark buildings as Earth Hour approaches

Written by . Published on March 30th 2013.


Darkness Visible: Why Is Manchester So Dark?
 

“WHY is the building so dark?” said Kjetil from Norway recently. “It looks spectacular but I can’t see it properly.”

It was 7pm. Manchester Town Hall, aka ‘the classic of its age’ and ‘the Victorian building par excellence’ was a shadow of itself. Aside from a tidsy bit of illumination inside the spire, the building had been reduced to a dark outline on the city centre skyline.

"International visitors expect an experience in the day and also the night, they expect the crown jewels to be lit

“Do you like to start Earth Hour early in Manchester?” Kjetil deadpanned.

Dark Town HallDark Town HallThe noble Viking was referring to the global annual event - called Earth Hour - organised by the World Wildlife Fund that encourages administrations, companies and households to turn off their lights for sixty minutes once a year to help 'raise awareness of climate change'.

This year the event takes place on Saturday 23 March between 8.30pm and 9.30pm. In 2012 Manchester participants included The Imperial War Museum North, The Trafford Centre and Manchester United.

There are many arguments for and against Earth Hour but a walk in the evening around Manchester city centre suggests that the idea has been adopted as permanent policy by the city council, retailers, many commercial property owners and religious and educational authorities.

Manchester is a dark, dark, city at present.

Dark John RylandsDark John RylandsWhen the sun dips below the horizon, the Town Hall is hidden, John Rylands Library is at best a silhouette and the Cathedral vanishes in the gloom. Meanwhile the fine commercial buildings of Manchester resemble Gotham after a Joker inspired power cut.

Brendan Keely, lighting specialist of architectural firm BDP, and I took an after-dark tour. We stood at the fountain in Albert Square looking down Cross Street.

“Where is the visual draw?” he asked. “What’s catching the eye down this street of relatively tall buildings?”

“Subway?” I suggested.

“Exactly. Is that what we want guests to the city to remember when they take a walk after dinner? That we have fast food outlets." 

We walked down Cross Street towards King Street.

“What lighting can do is create icons of the evening, beautiful situations, identifiers to the city,” Keely continues with infectious enthusiasm. “It’s another way for a city to show it’s proud of itself and is aware of the good things it possesses. It’s about drawing people together in the night time economy.”

Dark CathedralDark Cathedral“You do guided tours,” he says, “so can you imagine a guided tour of light around the city centre? This could be based on the acknowledged landmarks but given the right budget and imagination it could lead visitors and residents along tours devoted to various themes, maybe heritage or achievement or people.”

But isn't lighting buildings this way expensive and massively wasteful in terms of energy?

“Energy can be utilised in the right way or the wrong way,” says Keely. "You don't flood a building with light anymore and hope some of it will stick, you pick out details, emphasise what is special about the structure. Of course there has to be buy-in from owners, planners and tenants but lighting schemes can be cost-effective and deliver benefits in terms of investment and promotion whether commercial or civic."

Looking at the hidden structures in the night air around us, Keely, says, "Can Manchester ignore the fact that other cities, competitor cities you could say, light their centres more effectively?"

Brendan KeelyBrendan Keely

He’s right. The city aims to attract conferences, conventions, companies and students. It hosts thousands of football and music fans during big games and big concerts. Yet outside the Christmas markets we are the darkest of rival European cities. The gloom is often mentioned by visitors.

Yet huge amounts of council money, £425,000, can be deflected for events such as Alicia Keys ‘to raise city profile’. According to the lighting specialists Confidential has asked, an outlay of £100,000 would deliver an effective lighting scheme for the Town Hall.

A city artfully alive with illumination surely would lift the hearts of visitors and investors more than a gig or two? Despite deep cuts money has been ring-fenced for investment in culture, so why not treat lighting as part of a general culture offer?

We asked Manchester City Council about all this and their response was...er...unilluminating.

A spokesman said: "We are very supportive of both private and public buildings being lit at night in a way that is environmentally efficient and takes a responsible attitude towards light pollution. We would welcome any plans to do this in the city centre." 

Meanwhile Cityco, the city centre management company, have said that, broadly speaking they'd love to see more of the city lit up at night.  

We also asked if the floodlighting system already in place around the Town Hall couldn't be switched on again, and were told the lighting is not currently operational and it is not considered economic to repair. 

We don't have to look very far to find a city that takes the opposite view. 

Liverpool has a policy of illumination that puts its larger eastern neighbour in the shade. 

Liverpool: proud to be litLiverpool: proud to be lit

Ian McCarthy, of Liverpool Vision, the Mayor of Liverpool’s economic development company, is hugely proud of the way his city has been lit-up.

"The reason why we expend so much effort on lighting is simple," says McCarthy. "There’s lots of evidence to show it makes people feel safer, makes them feel comfortable and gives them another type of experience from the daytime one. In otherwords it encourages people to stay longer and spend more, which means an economic benefit. Money.

"International visitors expect an experience in the day and also the night, they expect the crown jewels to be lit, the Pierhead buildings, St George's Hall, but we've spread it wider than that. Meanwhile workers in the city stay longer if the place is more pleasant and better lit, the figures show this."

"The scheme started back in 2003," McCarthy continues. "We've aimed for a combination of public and private money, 50/50. The building owners sign a contract to turn lights on and maintain the scheme for a given period, we give capital support."

"It's been rewarding in so many ways. There's enormous pride when illuminated buildings become refreshed icons of the city. Often building owners will have a photo taken in the night rather than in the day. There are dozens of postcards of Liverpool taken at night now, and even specialist tours. That’s proof of the pudding, anecdotal verification of the benefits."

Like Brendan Keely, McCarthy thinks that progress in lighting technologies means bringing out the best in buildings has never been easier. 

"With architectural feature lighting we've been using white but warm light to show off the bones of structures. This enables us to pick out the features rather than blasting them with light. As for light pollution that's simply a symptom of poor design, you should focus light tightly to the detailing."

And the way forward? 

"We've come so far in Liverpool," says McCarthy. "We are aware we need to hold on to what we've achieved. In a competitive world we need to maintain profile. So we’ve refreshed the feature lighting investment structure for the city centre in the Strategic Investment Framework. This time we're placing the emphasis on the linkages between areas since the icons are already lit."

Absentee property owners don't give a toss about local pride, and with aesthetic illumination, many tenants will fight any contribution on a service charge like ninjas."

One Greater Manchester icon that is beautifully illuminated, like the Liverpool ones, is the Imperial War Museum North. 

Former director, Jim Forrester, who introduced the scheme, told Confidential: "Lighting up IWM North was a long held ambition to extend the impact of the extraordinary architecture into the long, dark evenings.

"With Lowry and MediaCityUK audiences viewing the building from over the Ship Canal most evenings, in addition to the daily transmission of BBC regional news, the need to prevent IWM North from disappearing into the darkness at night was clear. As a result, the Trustees of IWM decided to fund the scheme mostly from internal resources, supplemented by a grant from Trafford MBC. 

"The lighting scheme was designed by Adam Grater who proposed a simple white light wash over building, lighting the two sides of the airshard to create long-range impact and adding red detailing in two areas. This allowed the design of the building to continue to be the star of the show, as it is during the day." 

Lovely at the QuaysLovely at the Quays

Current director, Graham Boxer, IWM North Director, agrees: "IWM North deserves to be seen at night. The new lighting has helped to further develop The Quays as a world class visitor destination – one that is visually impressive, accessible and safe, both in the daytime and evening. It is also energy efficient and the illumination is carefully projected to avoid unnecessary light spill - and is turned off by midnight each night when visitors to the destination decrease, which provides a cost saving to IWM North." 

Back in the city centre commercial owners sometimes play the game even if the city administration won't. 

House of Fraser/Kendals is a beacon at night.  

Deansgate beaconDeansgate beacon

Across town a redevelopment of an existing architectural treasure will also receive an illuminating treatment. 

The owner, who wishes to remain anonymous until all the permissions sought have been granted (or not), says: "Firstly I love the building and I want to show it off, but also a well-lit building is a thing of beauty and can attract tenants who in turn feel proud. It's good for the psychology of the place, makes it more marketable.  

"But," he continues, "and it is a big but, we need something like the Liverpool scheme because the city needs to hold hands with the occupiers and join us in making the city brighter. Most owners will need incentives. 

“At the moment the perception among many commercial owners is that the council is battering us with rates, narrowing key central streets, putting up car parking prices and thus encouraging people not to come in and set up business. 

“Another difference for me is that I own the building, it's not managed by a surveyor with the owner collecting rents from two thousand miles away. I can make the decisions. Absentee property owners don't give a toss about local pride, and with aesthetic illumination, many tenants will fight any contribution on a service charge like ninjas."

Given Manchester city council's terse comments it will be down to individual owners who love the city to lead the cause rather than civic organisations. 

Yet it's still a crying shame that our crown jewels such as the Town Hall, John Rylands Library, the Civil Justice Centre, the Cathedral and so on, moulder in the dark rather than working as light-filled billboards advertising brand Manchester.

Even in times of economic woe and talk of cuts, cuts, cuts, other cities show that being competitive with others, even after dark, remains a high priority. 

People in the local media, and in the civil administration of Manchester, have often tiredly repeated clichés to me of how our city centre compares poorly to others in Britain. 

Perhaps in some ways we've reverted to type. 

Maybe this lack of commitment on Manchester's behalf stems from a failure to understand how impressive, even beautiful, the city, especially at its core, can be. This is a historical failure, stemming from an inferiority complex engendered in the nineteenth century, about the first industrial society and the smoky 'shock city' it created.  

Antique though this psychological glitch may be, it's still oddly pervasive. 

Manchester will readily celebrate its people, its achievements in science, industry, culture and sport but we don't much celebrate the physical fabric of our city centre. (An attitude that has also led to mis-management elsewhere across the city with buildings such as Heaton Hall, Baguley Hall and Hough End Hall.) 

People in the local media, and in the civil administration of Manchester, have often tiredly repeated clichés to me of how our city centre compares poorly to others in Britain.  

As a tour guide who has taken almost a hundred nationalities around the city I know we need have no fear, we just have to love what we’ve got as much as our visitors do. 

This year we will celebrate Manchester International Festival with a glorious line-up of visiting acts. We should make sure, if not for this festival, at least for the next in 2015, that we have a city centre that as Brendan Keely says,"creates icons of the evening, beautiful situations, identifiers. (A city centre) that shows Manchester is proud of itself."  

And proud of itself night and day, day and night. 

You can follow Jonathan Schofield on Twitter here @JonathSchofield or connect via Google+

Day time delight at Manchester Town HallDay time delight at Manchester Town Hall

Imperial War Museum lights up at twilightImperial War Museum lights up at twilight

Like what you see? Enter your email to sign up for our newsletters which are chock-a-block with more great reviews, news, deals and savings.

28 comments so far, continue the conversation, write a comment.

Poster BoyMarch 11th 2013.

Never mind the infamous Alicia Keys indulgence, let's add the cost to date of the vendetta against a certain Manchester-based hotel group...

In the current climate of budget cuts and need to stimulate economic growth, the City Council needs to examine it's priorities.

And does Liverpool City Council remain committed to funding the lighting of it's civic buildings after £141m of savings in the last two years, a further £32m required this year, £46m next year, £35m the year after, £36m the year after that?

Lighting is desirable, but it is a (commendable) want, rather than a need, providing there is a no net addition to light pollution, and that case is not proven.

Margaret HoustonMarch 11th 2013.

I wonder will there by any plans to light up the nearly-restored old round library in St Peter's Square. Would have been nice if the council could have built some lighting into those plans, and for the town hall (next door) of course.

1 Response: Reply To This...
Jonathan SchofieldMarch 11th 2013.

Margaret there are plans for St Peter's Square, but as I stated in the article they were being tight-lipped about the whole thing.

Simon TurnerMarch 11th 2013.

That £425,000 spent on Alicia Keys - has the Council's spending watchdog released the long-awaited report on that ridiculousness?

3 Responses: Reply To This...
AnonymousMarch 11th 2013.

Why is spending money on illuminating buildings better than spending money on promoting the city?

Simon TurnerMarch 11th 2013.

There's no evidence that the city has benefited in terms of higher profile let alone any financial benefit from the frivolous Alicia Keys project. The Council and Marketing Manchester took their eye of the ball in a major way.

AnonymousMarch 12th 2013.

You haven't said why you think spending money lighting up buildings is better.

As for the concert, it seems a reasonable idea to me. We need to capture mobile investment and the way to do that is build the city's brand. I'm sure there is a report somewhere on the council's website somewhere. Which bits do you disagree with?

What angers me is the lack of joined up thinking. Why go to the effort and expense of staging these sort of events then undermine it with poor planning decisions that destroy the things that make the city unique. I have in mind the decision to clear the Twisted Wheel here but I could refer to numerous examples where the city's industrial heritage has been demolished and forgotten.

AnonymousMarch 11th 2013.

Surely there are enough lighting whizz kids and facade lighting lads/ ladettes who could assist the Council (and landlords/ absentee landlords) to come up with lighting schemes for our building gems. Sadly we do not have buildings to match St.Georges Hall and the river frontage of Liverpool but there are land marks that do need to be brought to the attention of our now increasing tourist visitors by skillful, and relatively low cost, lighting. Any new development schemes should have a facade lighting erquirement in their planning consent, where applicable. Do we still have any planners in these days of justifiable cut backs ??

1 Response: Reply To This...
An O'NymousMarch 11th 2013.

Anon course we have the landmarks. They are just positioned within a tight urban landscape. That's why lighting up the city would work so well.

SoapysudsMarch 11th 2013.

As poster boy, pointed out, lighting-up buildings is expensive and it is very wasteful of energy. Light pollution is a major problem and needs to be reduced and not increased. Reducing the costs to council tax-payers, council and businesses, reducing the City's carbon footprint and reducing the load on the grid. It would also be beneficial to what little wild life is left in the City and allow people to see the stars. The whole point of Earth Hour, is to raise awareness of all the unnecessary lighting we have.

James CleggMarch 11th 2013.

Soapysuds what do you say to the cities of Asia and their neon and those of the Americas? Don't you find them exciting? Fun, joy in life, exuberance. Great. Embrace it. You clearly, given your 'Boycott Israeli Goods' icon, think only in politics and worthiness. Stop worrying about everything, light the city.

Charlie ButterworthMarch 12th 2013.

The tour idea with lights is a fabulous one. Maybe different colours at different times highlighting different periods of building, or different styles, it could be fun and educational as well.

AnonymousMarch 12th 2013.

Brendan Keely of BDP says, "I really think the City are missing an opportunity to pay us £100k to light up this building"

Funny that.

Charlie ButterworthMarch 12th 2013.

I don't think Keely is quoted saying that about the £100k. Read the story eh? And use you name.

1 Response: Reply To This...
tblzebraMarch 12th 2013.

For completely missing the joke, your post is even more amusing than the Anon's.

Alex24March 12th 2013.

Thanks for raising this issue - I'm currently living away from the city centre in Asia and would love the city council to adopt a similar approach to lighting areas up at night.

In fact, Manchester's centre, with all its social/crime problems, NEEDS this more than most places - . Areas such as Picc & Sackville Gardens in particular need to be well-lit to prevent crime and allow people to wander the streets in (relative) safety.

I also find it strange that a city which has always excelled in selling itself, doesn't want to illuminate its best architecture at all times. I fully agree with those saying the budget on the A Keys concert would have been better spent on erecting permanent lighting fixtures.

AnonymousMarch 12th 2013.

Lots of those absentee landlords are our own pension funds.

Jon XMarch 12th 2013.

It's not news that Mcr council doesn't have the budget, vision or imagination to improve our city centre offering, but their priorities do seem to be continually misguided.

This evening, as professor Brian Cox enlightens the property glitterati at MIPIM, no doubt detailing Manchester's many lights and delights, we will all shuffle home, through our unending winter darkness, against our city blackdrop - utterly bereft of architectural illumination (and probably hope).

That aside, no conversation around making buildings glow could be complete without mentioning that throbbing, pink nuclear monolith that has emerged from the earth opposite the Trafford Centre. What the hell is that!?!? Was that site contaminated?

3 Responses: Reply To This...
AnonymousMarch 13th 2013.

You seem to be in a different Manchester. In my Manchester winter darkness ends: after winter.

Jon XMarch 14th 2013.

Tuesday, March 19. The last day of the (astronomical) winter (Northern Hemisphere) 2013... It's sometimes hard being right all the time.

Jon XMarch 14th 2013.

Not sure which Manchester you're living in... Tuesday 19th March: end of (astronomical) winter in the northern hemisphere 2013. You've likely confused it with Christmas.

DrakeMarch 13th 2013.

I just wonder whether this is, or should be, the council's priority in the current times. I canonly imagine how they'd get hammered in the press for spending thousands on lighting schemes when cutting services. Alex24's point about security is a good one, but that would probably be different lighting to architecturally sensitive systems!

And as for your anonymous building owner, at some point businesspeople will realize that the council neither sets nor receives business rates!

Jill JillianMarch 13th 2013.

The reason they like to keep the city in darkness is so we can't see the filthy streets ,overflowing bins and chewing gum laden pavements,I was recently asked by an American tourist why our city is so dirty and crowded with drunken beggers when Liverpool just down the road is the exact opposite.

Jane WeightmanMarch 16th 2013.

Eric Pickles the Local Government Secretary would like councils to reduce the cost of translating services for non-English speaking residents. In right-on Manchester that should save a package some of which could be used to illuminate the city centre and give joy to the rest of us.

1 Response: Reply To This...
AnonymousMarch 16th 2013.

I doubt that.

Goodness me, there are a lot more dim witted 'Little Englanders' on these boards since the MEN changed their reader comment policy.

the Whalley RangerMarch 31st 2013.

I am reliably informed that one of the reasons why Rob Downey and Jude Law turned up to film in Manchester is due to the unique lighting conditions and atmosphere of our surroundings.

AnonymousMarch 31st 2013.

I would like to see some neon art (which can be quite interesting) on those derelict shops on Princess Parkway near the Royal Brewery in Moss Side - it would transform dereliction into something interesting and iconic and would be a good (improved) introduction for people coming into the city.

Roger BarberisMarch 31st 2013.

I understand that some time a go public money funded decorative lighting schemes on such private buildings as the Midland Hotel etc. Lasted about 5 mins beforfe the hotel turmed it off. The less light pollution the better - the council shouldnt be wasting money on christmas lights to entertain the chattering classes like JS and his chums - far too much public cash is trousered by architects in Manchester, and not enough helping the disadvantaged

To post this comment, you need to login.Please complete your login information.
OR CREATE AN ACCOUNT HERE..
Or you can login using Facebook.

Latest Rants

Anonymous

Repeating,without any evidence the same point that socialism = public services is hardly…

 Read more
Anonymous

You absolutely right,I hate all these bloody nimbys stopping development and progress.Of course if…

 Read more
Anonymous

Manchester's size and climate isn't dissimilar to Rotterdam or Dusseldorf but the city is held back…

 Read more
Anonymous

Straying off the point again David, which is that investing in public services is socialist but as…

 Read more

Explore The Site

© Mark Garner t/a Confidential Direct 2017

Privacy | Careers | Website by: Planet Code | SEO by The eWord