Welcome to Manchester Confidential
Reset Password
The Confidential websites will be undergoing routine updates. This may cause the sites to go offline. We apologise in advance for any inconvenience.

You are here: Manchester ConfidentialEntertainment & SportCinema.

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey 3D (12A)

Rachel Winterbottom loves it fast and full of high definition action

Published on December 17th 2012.


The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey 3D (12A)

AFTER the colossal success of his adaptation of Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings trilogy, ten years on writer/director Peter Jackson has returned to Middle-earth (AKA New Zealand) to film the prequel in three parts. This might be an unexpected journey, but Jackson’s certainly decided to take the long way around.  

On the one hand everything is eyeball-achingly detailed, on the other the characters move in slightly jerky, sped-up motions, like they’re all listening to The Benny Hill theme.

The film opens on the familiar faces of Ian Holm’s aged Bilbo and the curiously ageless Elijah Wood’s Frodo. It’s Holm’s genteel narration that takes us back 60 years to when he was Martin Freeman (Sherlock, The Office), and about to go on an adventure. The wizard Gandalf the Grey (Ian McKellen) turns up at Bilbo’s door unannounced and soon brings with him a company of 13 dwarves, largely distinguishable by their creative use of facial hair.

Led by the warrior Thorin Oakenshield (Richard Armitage, Spooks), the dwarves want the reluctant Bilbo to be their burglar on a quest to take their home and treasure back from the dragon Smaug. Unfortunately, their journey to the Lonely Mountain does not run smooth, an old enemy of Thorin’s is on their trail and the questers are beset by hungry mountain trolls, Warg-riding Orcs and tumorous goblins.   

I'm in good elfI'm a good health in good elf - have I said that right

The first thing you’ll notice about the return to Middle-earth is that everything is in sharp relief – and that isn’t just down to the 3D. Jackson’s filmed his trilogy at 48 frames per second, twice the normal speed. This takes some getting used to. On the one hand everything is eyeball-achingly detailed, on the other the characters move in slightly jerky, sped-up motions, like they’re all listening to The Benny Hill theme.

Any other special effects-laden film could bow under such close scrutiny; there’s no hiding any dodgy wigs and prosthetic noses when the audience can see into every pore on a dwarf’s face. However, the landscapes and people of Middle-earth can now be seen in all their exquisitely designed, awe-inspiring glory. The CGI has improved vastly since Jackson’s first foray into Tolkien’s literary world and the creatures that populate it are breathtakingly realised.

The choice to split Tolkien’s shorter work into three films has been criticised for stretching the material too thinly. It’s true that this has allowed for some overindulgence in scenes that would only usually see the light of day as DVD extras (the overlong opening may task the viewers who don’t care for harmonising dwarves). Still, the beauty of Tolkien’s work is in the details, and the script team are back on form.

Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens co-write again with Jackson, and they’ve been tasked with producing a cohesive prequel from a book that is considerably lighter in tone than its sequels. Largely, they are successful. There are a few moments that delve into dwarfish slapstick, which doesn’t always sit easily within the gravity of the situation. Still, that’s a minor quibble. The team even keeps the script clangers to a minimum (although that’s largely thanks to a lack of Legolas in this installment).

High-fantasy viewing demands credible actors to make it work, and Jackson’s recruited them by the cart load. Freeman’s everyman, fish-out-of-water shtick, is ideal to portray Bilbo. In a world where 50% of the population is CGI, Freeman’s naturalistic bumbling gives the film its realistic grounding. McKellen’s subtle and quick-to-anger Gandalf is as enjoyable as ever and when the wizard finally breaks out the magic, it’s genuinely awesome.

It takes some talent to wear a fake nose and hair braids and still be taken seriously. Armitage is note-perfect as the world-weary Thorin and makes it easy to see why the character demands loyalty from his band of skirmishing dwarves.

Still, the standout performance was always going to be the scene-stealing Andy Serkis. His performance capture antics have once again rendered the computerised (but scintillatingly accomplished) Gollum as a heart-breaking, funny and vile character as real and complex as any one of his human counterparts.

Hello againHello again

One criticism would be that the characters aren’t as distinctive as the Rings fellowship; while the design team has obviously worked hard to distinguish each dwarf, inevitably only a few stand out. After Thorin, there’s the reliable James Nesbit’s Bofur, Aiden Turner’s Kili (this trilogy’s Legolas) and Dean O’Gorman’s Fili (The Almighty Johnsons). The rest are recognisable by their most obvious feature, be that girth, baldness or an axe in the head. Hopefully the rest of the trilogy will make up for this disappointing characterisation.

Despite fears of there being too much filler, the film doesn’t often let up in pace and there are battles aplenty that are suitably grisly. This might be another quest plot that plods similar ground to the Rings trilogy, but there is a surfeit of new perils and monstrous entities to encounter that will keep you entertained.

If you like your fantasy succinct, then the first (or indeed any) part of The Hobbit trilogy isn’t for you. You can accuse Jackson of overindulgence, but fans will find much to enjoy in getting the extended edition early.

Rating 8/10

Yes, I'm a confused hero

Yes, I'm a confused hero

Like what you see? Enter your email to sign up for our newsletters which are chock-a-block with more great reviews, news, deals and savings.

DaveDecember 18th 2012.

Lovely Film. Truly inspiring. Makes me want to wear braces, move to the ‘shire and walk around with no shoes on.

Best movie this year. Second only to Taken 2

7.5/10

Amanda EveryDecember 18th 2012.

Went yesterday afternoon, not on the strength of this review, mind - it was total crud, IMO. I just couldn't get along with the film at all; felt very CGI to me and lacked the 'depth' that the LOtR movies had. I walked out about halfway through and I've never left a movie before. I'm too lazy to explain, but this link summarises well for me. news.yahoo.com/ne-bad-video-game-173813922.html…

Rena HigginsonDecember 18th 2012.

Wow Wow Wow Great film well worth the wait, it's got me hooked. I know I will have to go and see this film again, there is so much to take in.

After waiting 10 years I thought maybe it would be a so so film, be Hell No just as good as Lord Of The Rings.

Forget the kids just say your going shopping (then no on will want to go) take yourself off to the cinema to watch the Hobbit, have some you time.

Well worth it trust me I give it 10+/10

To post this comment, you need to login.Please complete your login information.
OR CREATE AN ACCOUNT HERE..
Or you can login using Facebook.

Latest Rants

Poster Boy

Unlike the reviewer, most of the audience of this film will not have the back knowledge of Chris…

 Read more
Lesley Hampson

We went to the Mark Kermode gig at Bridgewater Hall last night His special guests were the…

 Read more
John Nuttall

Actually Jonathan, you're almost correct in your imagining of the big house full of broadcasters as…

 Read more
LaToya Bollinger

One of the greatest Horror movies to date. Daniel Radcliffe isn't really given a role that he can…

 Read more

Explore The Site

© Mark Garner t/a Confidential Direct 2017

Privacy | Careers | Website by: Planet Code | SEO by The eWord